Judging books by covers and publishers by … covers
Okay, so this isn’t what I was going to write about either, but as it’s been the leitmotif of the last seven days or so, it’s what’s in the front of my mind. I’ve been emailing to and fro with a writer of my acquaintance whose novel has been accepted for publication by a small publisher. No agent involved, you see.
I am happy for her. Very much so, as she’s a writer whose work I’ve admired for several years and this could be her chance to break into a more mainstream audience which I believe she richly warrants. But there’s an issue.
Oh yes. You see, the writer (who has given her consent to me saying whatever I like as long as she can’t be identified and doesn’t have to read it) has a very clear idea what the cover should be like. She’s been working on the novel for seven years, and in all that time her vision of the cover art has become refined and condensed until it has crystallised into a literal picture.
The publisher, on the other hand, has something of a house style. And that house style is rather different to the writer’s mental image. So after six (I think) versions of a cover that writer has rejected (cogently but determinedly rejected, I may add) they are somewhat stalemated. The writer has produced a mock-up of her ideal cover and they’ve told her that (a) they can’t get permission for it and (b) even if permission was forthcoming, the cover design she’s got in mind is way over their budget.
My view, oft expressed to her, is that if she sees herself as having a career as a novelist, she should let go now. Another book will have another cover, perhaps even a different edition of this book, should it sell well, will have something more like the cover she craves, but head-butting her small publisher over this issue is likely to cost her everything: not just this book, but her reputation.
It’s a tough old world, and recession doesn’t make publishing any more tender. No publisher, particularly a small one gambling on new writers, wants to have a drama queen on the team. While it’s hard to let go of a long-held dream, that dream should have been of getting a novel published, not getting a novel with a specific cover published. If that’s what the writer wants, she should stump up the cash and self-publish the novel. She may be right or wrong, but what she’s not is a publisher. Horrible though it is, all she can hope is that she’s enough of a success to get more control over covers in future … and that isn’t going to happen if this novel doesn’t get published at all.
I've known other writers less than thrilled by their covers, who've gone on to have more input to later novels, or even to second edition covers, which made them happy. You can't win if you aren't in ...
Bookshop courtesy of ButterflySha at Flickr
Labels: book covers, book jackets, cover art, first time novelist, small publishers